Legal Opinion

Black v. Prince

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1985No. 70558, 70559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant Black, as administrator of the Estate of Lorenzo R. Prince, seeks a reversal of the judgment entered after a jury found that appellee Reginald Prince (also known as Reginald Lumpkin) was the natural son and lawful heir of his deceased father’s estate. Black contends that the verdict was contrary to law and should have been set aside, and that his motion for directed verdict should have been granted. Reginald cross-appealed, claiming his motion for directed verdict should have been granted. We have consolidated the cases for appellate purposes.

Lorenzo Prince died…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poulos v. McMahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Hill v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Tolbert v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Black v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API