Legal Opinion

Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. Radcliffe

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 14, 1947PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The claim of the named defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff, for unemployment compensation, as well as the claims of some forty other of its former employees, was approved by the administrator acting by a proper representative. The plaintiff was given notice of the ruling, filed an appeal and applied for a hearing before an unemployment commissioner, based upon the claim that the unemployment was due to the existence of a labor dispute at the plaintiff’s factory. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 1339e (b)(3). The defendant made a motion to dismiss the appeal and it was granted by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Biz v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Watson v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Barco Manufacturing Co. v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Taylor v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API