Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. Radcliffe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The claim of the named defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff, for unemployment compensation, as well as the claims of some forty other of its former employees, was approved by the administrator acting by a proper representative. The plaintiff was given notice of the ruling, filed an appeal and applied for a hearing before an unemployment commissioner, based upon the claim that the unemployment was due to the existence of a labor dispute at the plaintiff’s factory. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § 1339e (b)(3). The defendant made a motion to dismiss the appeal and it was granted by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Biz v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Watson v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Barco Manufacturing Co. v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Taylor v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.