Legal Opinion

Carter v. Schackne

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The question presented for determination is one of venue. Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover damages for the alleged wrongful killing of his intestate, Flossie Carter, in an automobile accident which occurred in Davidson county, Tenn. Plaintiff is a resident of Davidson county. Summons was issued to the sheriff of Davidson county and returned not to be found in his county as to all of the defendants. Defendants Schackne and Quinn are residents of the State of Ohio, while defendants Mc-Mahan and Ferrell are residents of Sumner county, Tenn. Summons was served on the nonresident…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cartmell v. Mechanics' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Carroll v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Burns v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  3. Crawford v. CarsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Stevens v. LintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Alcarese v. StingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API