Legal Opinion
Amberson v. Patterson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 12, 1933No. 7 Div. 199PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was originally for recovery of a tract of land described. There was demand by defendants for a'jury trial and interrogatories to plaintiff calling for abstract and source of title, and answer thereto.
Thereupon there was a petition to transfer the case to the equity side of the court, and order of and due transfer, for that an equitable right was presented ‘ for decision that could not “be disposed of in the law side of the court.” Section 6490, Code.
The original bill filed in equity by the defendants, James Amberson et al., asserted that respondent (appellant) James…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mink v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- West End Sav. Bank v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Louisiana State Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Cudd v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. LassetterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Springdale Gayfer's Store Co. v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Ballentine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Clipper v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Des Portes v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Patterson v. First Nat. Bank of PiedmontSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.