Legal Opinion

Union Trust v. MacQuinn-Tweedie

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 5, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.

[¶ 1] M.O.M. Corporation and Main Street Associates, the holders of an option, and other parties claiming by, through, or under them, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and order of sale entered in the District Court (Bar Harbor, Staples, J.) in favor of the mortgagee, Union Trust, and against the mortgagor, Lisa Mac-Quinn-Tweedie. Guardian Trust, an attaching creditor, appeals from the court’s denial of its motion to reconsider its finding that Guardian Trust was not a party in interest. We modify the judgment to include Guardian Trust as a party-in-interest, and as modified, we affirm.

[¶…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DiPietro v. BoyntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. Frisbee v. FrisbeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  3. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development v. Union Mortgage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Bernstein v. BlumenthalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Davis v. Cox (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API