Legal Opinion
People v. Gingras
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 20, 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*23OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed on the law, defendant’s motion to suppress evidence denied, and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.
After a hearing, the court granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, concluding that the trooper lacked probable cause to arrest defendant for driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]). The court made no credibility determinations, and ruled, in effect, that the hearing evidence was legally insufficient to establish probable cause.
Upon our review of the evidence (e.g. Orminski v Village of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BlajeskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hoyos v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Costello v. MilanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- People v. O'NeilNassau County District Court · 2014
- People v. Abrucci-KohanMonroe Justice Court · 2016
- People v. Frankel (Scott)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.