Legal Opinion

State v. Still

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided February 2, 1926No. 21PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The cases cited by the State involve indictments for keeping houses of ill fame. King v. Commonwealth, 154 Ky. 829, 159 S. W. 593; State v. Hull, 18 R. I. 236, 26 A. 191, 20 L. R. A. 609, 615.

It is conceded by the defendant that evidence of the general reputation of the house is sometimes admitted when the particular nuisance alleged consists in keeping a house of this character. In admitting such evidence, the Courts have apparently applied two theories:

1. That the particular statutory charge relied on makes reputation an essential element…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. State v. HullSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
  3. Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Downs v. RickardsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1872
  5. State v. BoardmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ThomasNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API