Legal Opinion

Spearhead Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 7, 1983No. Court No. 81-6-00780Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The question presented in this action pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of inflatable air caps and poncho capes used by children on Halloween. The merchandise was classified as “Toys * * * not specially provided for: Other: Other” under the provisions of item 737.95, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68/9 and assessed with duty at 17.5% ad valorem or 16.8% ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry.

Plaintiff contends the imported merchandise constitutes “parts of toys” under said item 737.95, and not toys or unfinished…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Carrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API