Legal Opinion

The S. V. Luckenbach

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 28, 1912No. Nos. 212, 213PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Per curiam

An appeal in admiralty being considered in this circuit a new trial, parties not appealing may ask for affirmative relief. If a party does ask for it in this court, he will be treated in respect to costs and interest as if he had actually appealed. In this case there was a decree in the District Court for divided damages, which had been affirmed, except in two trifling particulars. The owner of the steamer Otta appealed and paid for printing the record. Upon the argument, the owner of the steamer Euckenbach, which did not appeal, contended. that the decree should be reversed as to it, and *894the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. The ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  2. Rebecca ClydeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1875
  3. The JasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. Browne v. The C. P. RaymondU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The President MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. C. F. Harms Co. v. Upper Hudson Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  3. Lauro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Skagit River Navigation & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API