Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Caskey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1972No. A-15640Published

1ConcurrenceSimms, Judge

(specially concurring):

Because of the dissent written in this case, it becomes imperative that a special concurring opinion be rendered, even though this writer is acutely aware of Bacon’s admonition in his. Essay of Judicature: “An over speaking judge is no well tuned cymbal.”

While both opinions written by my colleagues dwell11 at some length upon the standing of the defendant in this case to object to the seizure of the items stolen in the' burglary, it is to be emphasized that defendant did not object to the introduction of the questioned evidence nor did he object to any testimony…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sadler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Cherry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Crum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API