Legal Opinion
Wolgamott v. Lanham
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 1995No. 71A04-9502-CV-48PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Eric Eugene Wolga-mott appeals from the trial court's denial of his Motion to Intervene In Paternity Action For The Purposes Of Establishing Visitation with E.M., the daughter of his former girlfriend, Sheryl Victoria Lanham.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Wolgamott presents two issues for our review which we consolidate and rephrase as:
1. Did the trial court erroneously deny Wolgamott's motion to intervene pursuant to Ind.Trial Rule 247
FACTS
E.M., born, on January 19, 1988, is the minor child of Lanham and Thomas W. McClintic. Paternity of EM. was established on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Williams v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Looper v. McManusCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Simpson v. SimpsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Worrell v. Elkhart County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Kitchen v. KitchenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Amy L. Brown v. Adrian LunsfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- A.C. v. N.J.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- National City Bank v. Douglass ShortridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1998