Legal Opinion

Railroad v. Pitt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

PROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Montgomery County. A. H. Muneord, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is an action by G-. L. Pitt, administrator, against the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, for having negligently and wrongfully caused the death of his intestate, Newton Sullivan, by requiring him to alight from - a moving train.

The defendant pleaded not guilty. On the issue so made the case was tried, resulting in verdict and judgment for $4,000 in favor of the plaintiff.

Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment *88having b'een successively made and overruled, the defendant appealed in error.

The deceased was an employe of the defendant, engaged with numerous other hands' in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holton v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Indianapolis, Pittsburg, & Cleveland Railroad v. Keely's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Woodward v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Love v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Railroad v. BeanTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illinois Cent. R. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Hammond v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  5. Sanders' Adm'x v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API