Legal Opinion

Walker v. Norton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The defendant presents this case on motion for a new trial. The motion recites the usual grounds.

The action was assumpsit, to recover a balance alleged as due the plaintiff from the defendant, as wages for the personal services of the former, from April 15,1928, to December 8, 1929, the latter date inclusive, at $32.00 per week. Credits aggregated $2,214.00.

The plea was the general issue.

The amount of the verdict was $581.13, apparently all plaintiff sued for, including interest from the date of the writ.

Whether, in a particular case, where the testimony is conflicting, liability has been…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. MasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  2. Poulin v. BilodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  3. Fillion v. AllainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API