Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Mayfield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1990No. 2669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This appeal stems from the trial court's decision granting summary judgment for DefendantsAppellees James A. Mayfield, et al. The trial court found that the work-related injury sustained by Appellant Carroll S. Lynch was not localized in Ohio and therefore Appellees were without jurisdiction to award workers' compensation benefits to her.

Lynch presents a single issue for our consideration:

Is employment "localized" in Ohio for purposes of workers’ compensation coverage when a person is hired in Arkansas but shortly thereafter transferred to Springfield, Ohio where her day-today employment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foran v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Phelps v. Positive Action Tool Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Prendergast v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Industrial Commission v. GardinioOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Stanadyne, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McBride v. Coble Express, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Robert M. Neff, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Schramm v. Appleton Papers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Coleman v. KBO, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Linardos v. Joe Tex, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API