Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Glascock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating, the facts). It is first insisted that the court erred in not requiring appellees to make a cost bond upon its motion made during the trial. The motion for cost bond, however, is not shown in the record, nor that any exception was saved to the ruling of the court thereon, nor was the failure to require the giving of the cost bond set out in the motion for a new trial; and this objection therefore cannot be considered here.
In addition, the plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that they were residents of the State of Arkansas, and there was no denial thereof. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Darden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. Kelly ex rel. MilhoanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. CoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Swift v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963