Legal Opinion

Olshen v. Kaufman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*425LUSK, J.

This is an action to recover the balance owing on a check for $5,750 given to the plaintiff by the defendant Leonard I. Kanfman, Jr. The other defendant, Leon W. Behrman, is the gnardian of the estate of Leonard I. Kanfman, Jr., a spendthrift. When the action was commenced the only defendant was Kaufman; the guardian was not made a defendant until after the case came on for trial.

The question is whether, under the statute of this state providing for the appointment of guardians for spendthrifts, recovery may be had on the contract of a spendthrift when his guardian has repudiated the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hughes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wadsworth v. . Sharpsteen and MoffatNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. General Casmir Pulaski Building & Loan Ass'n v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Allen ex rel. Stephens v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kirkpatrick v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Union Trust and Savings Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Williams v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API