Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Josef Israels II, & Doubleday, Doran & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

The complaint is in libel. On this motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike out the allegations of para*296graphs “ third ” and/or “ fourth,” the facts alleged must be taken as true. The “ third ” paragraph sets forth the facts relied on to show the application of the defamatory matter to plaintiff. The “ fourth ” paragraph alleges the statements which plaintiff asserts constitute the libel. The libelous matter complained of was published concerning plaintiff by and through the representation of plaintiff in the character “ Ralph Halloran ” in defendants’ book. The defamation is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Dinkelspiel v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Van Heusen v. . ArgenteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel Fetler v. Houghton Mifflin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Cohalan v. New York World-Telegram Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API