Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Den Heuval v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1989No. 726Published

1DissentMcEWEN, Judge

While my respect for the insight of the members of the majority cause me to be hesitant to differ, I am compelled to expression of the view that this appeal should be quashed.

Appellant concedes that as a general rule, an order denying a petition to intervene is an interlocutory order, not appealable as of right. See: Scharnitzki v. Bienenfeld, 368 Pa.Super. 610, 534 A.2d 825 (1987); Ginter v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 359 Pa.Super. 200, 202, 518 A.2d 850, 851 (1986); Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc., 345 Pa.Super. 582, 584, 498 A.2d 977, 979 (1985); M. London, Inc. v. Fedders…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Myers v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Frey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Lazzarotti v. JulianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. M. London, Inc. v. Fedders Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API