Legal Opinion

Port Huron Machinery Co. v. Hurto

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. W. H. McHenry, Judge. Action to recover the contract price of a machine that the defendant agreed to purchase. Judgment for the plaintiff; the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The parties hereto entered into a written. contract, of which the following is a copy:

Dated at Laurel, 3-25-1910.' To the Port Huron Machinery Co., Ltd., Des Moines, Iowa: You may deliver on board cars at Port Huron, Mich, on or about Palmer, la., and ship for me in your care to Laurel, la., county of Marshall, and state of Iowa, the following mentioned goods: One 33x54 Port Huron secondhand separator, complete price, $350.00. Title: The title to said goods shall remain in the company -until the purchase price is paid or satisfactorily secured. Undersigned will receive the machinery, pay the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MarkertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Tufts v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Iowa Mausoleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Niederhauser v. Jackson Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API