Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1909No. 17,798PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Charles A. O’Niell, Judge. Frank and Fielden Price were convicted and fined for violating the law in relation to the sale of intoxicating liquors, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

The state has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the ease. The jurisdiction of this court in criminal cases is limited to cases where “the punishment of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be inflicted, or a fine exceeding $300, or imprisonment exceeding, six months, is actually imposed.” Const. art. 85. The sentence condemns each of the two defendants to pay a fine of $150 and the costs of court, and adds the following:

“That the defendants Frank and Fielden Price be and they are each permanently deprived hereafter of the privilege of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McConnellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  2. State v. BelleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Hanscomb v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1858
  4. Petition of KishbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frazier v. TerrillArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ex Parte MorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. State v. RugonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. State v. TrappSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API