Legal Opinion

Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1985No. 83-2065Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 F.2d 1416

Jeanne Armsted RHODY and Donnell Rhody, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 83-2065.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 30, 1985.

Howard K. Berry, III, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Howard K. Berry, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., on briefs) of Berry & Berry, P.C., Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Brian M. Dell of Speck & Dell, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellee.

Before McKAY, BREITENSTEIN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

The issue presented by this diversity action is whether, under…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API