Banks v. Slay
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
• A core tenet of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 jurisprudence is that an official-capacity suit against an individual is really a suit against that official’s government entity. This case -applies that principle,- as the primary issue we are called upon to decide is whether—under the facts of this case—a properly served, yet unnamed, government entity may evade a judgment obtained solely against an employee in his official capacity. Our answer, flowing from settled precedent, is that it may not. We affirm the district court1 and, on cross-appeal, affirm its orders on post-judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Leonetti's Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Rew Mktg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Maria Childress v. Fox AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Doe v. Fort Zumwalt R-Ii Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Tom Dunne, Jr. v. Resource Converting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Edwin Van Dorn v. Scott HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.