Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnstowne Centre Partnership v. Chin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1982No. 17693Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Webber

Although I am less than totally convinced that a proper disposition has been made of the issues raised by Chins in their cross-appeal, especially with reference to another restaurant in the Centre, yet I will defer to the trial court on these matters and concur in the majority’s holding on these. I cannot concur in their disposition of the question of Chins’ liability for rent during the interim period between tenants and dissent on that point.

The majority speaks of the Parthenon and Giordano as “substitute tenants” and places great reliance on paragraph 14 of the Chin lease. In my judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wanderer v. Plainfield Carton Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Wohl v. YelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. West Side Auction House Co. v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Scheinfeld v. Muntz TV, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Hinde v. MadanskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API