Ferriell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
In this social security case, Plaintiff seeks review of the Appeals Council’s decision that he is not entitled to receive disability benefits. Because we find that the decision in Plaintiffs case was entered pursuant to the Appeals Council’s authority to reopen and revise the decisions of an administrative law judge, and that the procedures used did not violate Plaintiffs right to due process, we AFFIRM the district court’s ruling upholding the Appeals Council’s decision.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 17, 2005, William Ferriell submitted an application…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brooke Taskila v. Comm'r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Carter v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Figueroa v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Bakke, Dennis v. Saul, AndrewDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.