Legal Opinion
Cloer v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 25, 2008No. 05-1002 VPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
I. Introduction
The ease before the court is a review of the Chief Special Master Golkiewicz’s decision dismissing petitioner’s claim for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program” or “the Vaccine Act”),142 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34. Cloer v. Sec’y of the Dep’t of Health & Human Sevrs. (“Cloer I”), 2008 WL 2275574 (Sp.Mstr.Fed.Cl. May 15, 2008). The issue in this case surrounds the proper interpretation of the Vaccine Act’s limitations period. Section 300aa-16(a)(2) of Title 42 bars all petitions seeking compensation for any…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Melissa Cloer, M.D. v. Sec. Of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Carson v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bean-Sasser v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.