Legal Opinion

Rucker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 1992No. 91-2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of his judgment and sentence on burglary and criminal mischief charges. We affirm the first two issues, but reverse as to the sentencing issue raised and remand for resentencing pursuant to Anderson v. State, 592 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), rehearing denied (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 13, 1992) and Hodges v. State, 596 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As in Anderson and Hodges, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:

DOES THE HOLDING IN EUTSEY V. STATE, 383 SO.2D 219 (FLA.1980), THAT THE STATE HAS NO BURDEN OF PROOF AS TO WHETHER THE CONVICTIONS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Hodges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API