Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mack Trucks of Arkansas, Inc. v. Yarbrough

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 13, 1971No. 5-5712Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In order to better demonstrate the reasons for my disagreement with the majority, it will be necessary that I first elaborate on the facts in the case.

The return of the sheriff on the original writ showed that Walter Yarbrough refused to deliver possession of the truck or to disclose its location, even though it was admitted when the case came on for trial that he was in substantial and material default on his enforceable security agreement with appellant. Only when a second order for delivery directed the arrest of this defendant and a codefendant, if the truck was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sibeck v. McTiernanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Strahorn-Hutton-Evans Commission Co. v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Bankers Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Hester v. FiniganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. McHaney v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API