Legal Opinion
Manuel v. Toner Plus, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2012No. 25851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Michael Manuel, the sole owner of Toner Plus, Inc., closed his business on May 30, 2009. Manuel then filed a personal claim for unemployment compensation benefits. The South Dakota Department of Labor (Department) determined Manuel was ineligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits because he “voluntarily” dissolved his business and did not have “good cause” for doing so under SDCL 61-6-13 to -13.1. The circuit court affirmed the Department’s decision. Manuel appeals. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] Toner Plus was primarily in the business of selling toner and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Red Bird v. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Hanmer v. Department of Industry Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Vollmer v. Wal-Mart Store, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Puetz Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re the Amended & Restated Nelson Living TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Appeal of Easton v. Hanson School District 30-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- DeBoer v. DeBoerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Deboer v. DeboerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012