Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roberts v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1934No. 9923Published

1Dissent

Hutcheson, J.,

dissenting. 1. In a consideration of the instant case it is necessary to determine the nature of the interest held by the first beneficiary under the policy of insurance taken out upon the life of Paul Hardin, deceased. If the beneficiary had no vested interest under the contract of insurance, it mil not be presumed that she survived her husband, so as to render her interest, otherwise merely contingent, a vested interest. Northwestern M. L. Ins. Co. v. Greiner, 115 Mich. 639 (74 N. W. 187). It has been held that where there is no presumption of survivorship among persons who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newell v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Wall v. PfanschmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Fuller v. LinzeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. McGowin v. . MenkenNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Russell v. HallettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API