Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Capital Equipment Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 8, 1971No. Record No. 7360Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in not finding as a matter of law that defendant was the principal by whom plaintiff was entitled to be reimbursed for sums paid by him as surety.

The parties waived a trial by jury and the trial court heard the evidence ore terms. In these circumstances the ruling of the trial court in favor of the defendant is presumed to be correct and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it. Wright and Hunt, Inc. v. Wright, 205 Va. 454, 460, 137 S.E.2d 902, 907 (1964).

The burden is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  2. Wright and Hunt, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API