Wise v. Frey
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cuming county. cited Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y., 350. Howard v. Janes, 50 Ala., 67. Newton v. Howe, 29 Wis., 536. Gilmans v. Williams, 7 Wis., 329. Servanti v. Busk, 43 Cal., 238. Brown v. Harris, 67 North Carolina, 140. Badcliff v. Wood, 25 Barb., 52. Ereeman on Executions, 342. Carpenter v. Harrington, 25 Wendell, 370. Ford v. Johnson, 34 Barb., 365. Bobinson v. Wiley, 15 N. Y., 494. cited Sutcliffe v. Bohrmcm, 18 Ohio, 181. Gaylord, Son <&…
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Cuming county. cited Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y., 350. Howard v. Janes, 50 Ala., 67. Newton v. Howe, 29 Wis., 536. Gilmans v. Williams, 7 Wis., 329. Servanti v. Busk, 43 Cal., 238. Brown v. Harris, 67 North Carolina, 140. Badcliff v. Wood, 25 Barb., 52. Ereeman on Executions, 342. Carpenter v. Harrington, 25 Wendell, 370. Ford v. Johnson, 34 Barb., 365. Bobinson v. Wiley, 15 N. Y., 494. cited Sutcliffe v. Bohrmcm, 18 Ohio, 181. Gaylord, Son <& Co. v. Imhoff c& Co., 26 Ohio State, 317. Tills’ Case, 3 Neb., 261. Central Law Journal, vol. 4, p. 527. Id., vol. 5,…
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
This was an action in replevin to recover the possession of certain personal property which the defendant, as sheriff, had taken under several executions issued against the property of a partnership, of which the plaintiff was then a member. The question presented is as to the sufficiency of the petition to show a good cause of action.
The petition shows the existence of the partnership, the recovery of the several judgments, and the levy of the executions upon the property in question. It further appears that after the goods were seized by the sheriff the members of the firm conceived the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gaylord, Son & Co. v. M. Imhoff & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1875
- Servanti v. LuskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porch v. Arkansas Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Lininger v. RaymondNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- H. Rosenbaum & Co. v. William H. Hayden & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Wise v. FreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1879