People v. Grossman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of *986conviction for first degree rape (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) and first degree sodomy (Penal Law § 130.50 [1]), defendant’s primary claim is that the trial court erred in its Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) by permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine him regarding whether he had perjured himself while testifying at a prior trial about crimes for which he had received immunity (see, New Jersey v Portash, 440 US 450, 459-460). Even assuming that use of this testimony for the purpose of impeachment was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BostwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987