Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bowsher v. Merck & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1983No. 81-1273Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice White

I join Part V of the Court’s opinion, and I concur in the remainder to the extent it upholds the GAO’s right to inspect Merck’s “direct” cost records.1 I dissent to the extent the Court refuses to allow the GAO access to any of Merck’s “indirect” cost records.

The statutory provisions at issue, 10 U. S. C. § 2313(b) and 41 U. S. C. § 254(c), clearly were intended to allow the GAO the right to a reasonable degree of access to contractors’ records needed to determine whether prices charged to the Government were excessive. Of course, this right was not intended to be unlimited; the Court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API