Legal Opinion

McLaughlin's Administrators v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 10, 1839Published

Chancery. From the Circuit Court eor Scott County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court-

William Clark obtained judgment against John McLaughlin’s administrators, for a demand due to their intestate, at the July Court, 1821, for two lfundre'd and twenty one dollars fifteen jcents damages, and. eleven dollars forty seven-cents costs. His execution was levied on a negro boy, by the name of Jack,’as assets in the hands of the administrators — he being found in the possession of Mrs. McLaughlin, who was one of them; and up^n a sale under the levy, Enos Daniel became the purchaser, and sold the boy to Keningham.

Mary McLaughlin, one of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stephens' Administrator v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API