Legal Opinion

In re Apergis

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 30, 2015No. Case No. 1-14-41043-nhlPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION

NANCY HERSHEY LORD, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

The chapter 7 debtor Annette Apergis (the “Debtor”) claimed a $150,000 home*26stead exemption pursuant to § 5206(a) of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (the “C.P.L.R.”). Creditors Jeffery and Richard Siegel (the “Siegels”) object to the Debtor’s homestead exemption, arguing that she does not meet the requirements under § 5206 because she did not intend to permanently reside in her home as of the petition date, having moved into the home only a short time before the scheduled…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Town of Skaneateles v. Scott (In Re Scott)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  5. United Baking Co. v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers' Union, Local 221Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  2. Elaine M. ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  3. Francis Nuara and Lori NuaraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  4. INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY AND NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, et al. v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SACRAMENTODistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API