Legal Opinion

Sherer v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1951No. 32284PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

This court held, in effect, in the recent case of Erdman v. Mestrovich, 155 Ohio St., 85, 97 N. E. (2d), 674, that the assured-clear-distance-ahead rule has no application in a situation where a person, motor vehicle or object suddenly enters the path of another motor vehicle from the side, unless such person, motor vehicle or object comes into the view of the operator of the other motor vehicle at a point sufficiently distant ahead to enable such operator, in the exercise of ordinary care, to stop his vehicle and avoid a collision.

Applying such holding to the instant case wherein plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erdman v. MestrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rothe v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Gallagher v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Spiegel v. StrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vavrina v. GreczanikOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Reynolds v. City of OakwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Kelley v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Reed v. MolnarOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Robyn Crummett v. Donald J. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API