People v. Bell
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Bowman
Although I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the written order in the present case is insufficient to support a finding of contempt, I disagree with its conclusion that the report of proceedings shows contempt beyond a reasonable doubt. Direct criminal contempt of court is " ' "conduct which is calculated to embarrass, hinder or obstruct a court in its administration of justice or derogate from its authority or dignity, thereby bringing the administration of law into disrepute.” ’ ” (People v. Simac (1994), 161 Ill. 2d 297, 305, quoting People v. L.A.S. (1986), 111 Ill. 2d 539, 543,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. JavarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.