Legal Opinion

Pope v. Heldman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, a child 5 years and 2 months of age who appears by guardian ad litem, from a judgment which the circuit court entered in favor of the defendant after sustaining the latter’s motion for a directed verdict. The plaintiff submits one assignment of error. It challenges the order which directed the verdict in defendant’s favor.

August 13, 1955, at 1:30 p. m. when the plaintiff was entering upon a thoroughfare near Eugene known as River Road the defendant drove his automobile into collision with him. This action which charges negligence seeks an award of damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Suburban Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lane v. HatfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Davis v. LavenikOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Forrest v. TurlayOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Maletis v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lehr v. GRESHAM BERRY GROWERSOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kroft v. GrimmOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Isaacson v. WirklanOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lehr v. GRESHAM BERRY GROWERSOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Taylor v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API