Legal Opinion

Montoya-Navia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 1997No. 95-1347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPE, Judge.

Freddy Montoya-Navia appeals his conviction for drug trafficking. We reverse.

Prior to trial, defendant moved to perpetuate the testimony of two out-of-country witnesses. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(j). Telephone depositions had already been taken of the two witnesses. Whether to grant a motion to perpetuate testimony is within the sound discretion of the court, and such a motion may be granted if the court is satisfied that the perpetuation of testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.290; 19 Fla. Jur.2d Discovery and Depositions § 125 (1980); 23…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Alvarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API