Montoya-Navia v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COPE, Judge.
Freddy Montoya-Navia appeals his conviction for drug trafficking. We reverse.
Prior to trial, defendant moved to perpetuate the testimony of two out-of-country witnesses. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(j). Telephone depositions had already been taken of the two witnesses. Whether to grant a motion to perpetuate testimony is within the sound discretion of the court, and such a motion may be granted if the court is satisfied that the perpetuation of testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.290; 19 Fla. Jur.2d Discovery and Depositions § 125 (1980); 23…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Alvarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000