State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
In its first assignment of error, Seaboard contends that the Commission lacks jurisdiction under the laws of North Carolina to consider petitioners’ complaint. The heart of Seaboard’s argument is that petitioners’ complaint addresses a dispute between petitioners and Seaboard which is essentially private in nature, in the nature of a complaint in tort and not related to or within the powers of the Commission to regulate railroads as public utilities. Seaboard correctly argues that the Commission is a statutory body possessing only the authority conferred upon it by the General…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas A. Donelon, Charles J. Eagan, Jr. v. New Orleans Terminal Company and Federal Railroad Administration of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. National Merchandising Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009