Rice v. St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This was an appeal by plaintiffs from an order of tbe late court of common pleas for Bamsey county, Hall, J., presiding, denying an application for the appointment of a receiver, in an action brought for the foreclosure of a certain mortgage or deed of trust.
Read the full summary
This was an appeal by plaintiffs from an order of tbe late court of common pleas for Bamsey county, Hall, J., presiding, denying an application for the appointment of a receiver, in an action brought for the foreclosure of a certain mortgage or deed of trust. In denying this motion the court, among other things, said: “I do not propose to enter into an elaborate statement of the facts, as disclosed by the voluminous affidavits read upon this motion, but will merely state the conclusions to which I have come, accompanied by a few observations bearing upon the subject. “Probably the most…
1Opinion of the Court
Berry, J.*
The St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation created by the legislature of Minnesota, executed on the second day of June, 1862, to the plaintiffs Edmund Rice, Horace Thompson and Samuel J. Tilden, as trustees, a mortgage or deed of trust to secure an issue of the bonds of said company to the amount of $1,200,000. This action is brought for the purpose of foreclosing said mortgage or deed of trust, and in aid of the foreclosure, and upon sundry allegations in the complaint, a receiver is prayed for. The prayer is that “pending this suit the court forthwith appoint a…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Michigan Trust Co. v. Lansing Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Union Trust Co. v. Charlotte General Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- McClory v. RicksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.