Legal Opinion

Paine v. Continental & Commercial National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 1931No. Gen. No. 34,591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

In an action of assumpsit tried by the court, plaintiffs had judgment for $11,562.50, from which defendant appeals.

Although the respective briefs give considerable space to a recital of the pleadings, yet we are not asked to pass on any point arising on them. The declaration in appropriate language alleged that defendant was obligated for money had and received by reason of its payment of its cashier’s check upon a forged indorsement. Defendant’s liability, if any, must be determined upon this action.

The facts were stipulated as follows: Plaintiffs are partners engaged in the stock brokerage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seaboard National Bank v. Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. McCornack v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Independent Oil Men's Ass'n v. Fort Dearborn National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. American Express Co. v. Peoples Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Farmer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Produce Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API