Legal Opinion

Bradfield v. Hendrickson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1958No. 18,960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBowen, P. J.

The appellants filed a suit in replevin in the court below alleging that they were entitled to the immediate possession of a written document, to-wit: “A contract executed on or about the 15th day of February, 1955, signed by Gilbert L. Bradfield and Pearl L. Bradfield, as one party, and Alphons H. Baehl *600and Irma L. Baehl, as other parties to said contract.” The complaint contained the usual and proper allegations in replevin, and the prayer of such complaint demanded judgment for immediate possession of such document and all other proper relief. The appellee, an attorney, filed answer to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bush v. GroomesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Interests of DuganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API