Legal Opinion

Bolcom-Canal Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1938No. 42205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge

The plaintiff is suing for a refund of taxes paid for the year 1918. Plaintiff, during that year, was affiliated for income and profits tax purposes with the Dickie Manufacturing Company and other corporations. The entire capital stock of the Dickie Manufacturing Company was owned by *170the Boicom Mills, Inc. Tentative and, subsequently, completed consolidated income and profits tax returns were filed by plaintiff for itself and affiliated corporations and information returns were filed by tbe subsidiary corporations showing that the entire tax was to be assessed against the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superheater Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API