Legal Opinion

King v. Ohio, etc., R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided July 1, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gresham, D. J.

The petitioner, Henry I. Bruning, by this proceeding seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained in coupling, cars at North Vernon, Indiana, while in the service of the receiver. The petitioner and others, on the fifth day of January, 1880, were making up a freight train at this point to go south over the Louisville branch of the Ohio, etc., Railroad Company. He was assisting as brakeman in switching and coupling, and finally ran along with the train as it backed up to a coal car, and hurriedly stepped in between this car and the rear car of the train, when they were three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gibson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Dillon v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rio Grande Southern Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API