Legal Opinion

Terceira v. Terceira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated April 6, 1991, as directed the husband to pay the sum of $150 per week in pendente lite child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Frankel v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Marohn v. MarohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudak v. HudakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Goldstein v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Calia v. CaliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Patanjo v. PatanjoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API