Legal Opinion
Lane v. Marion County D.A.'s Office
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 31, 2021No. A171380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
296 Submitted September 8, 2020, affirmed March 31, 2021 Cody LANE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARION COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; and Paige Clarkson, in her official capacity as District Attorney for Marion County, Respondents-Respondents. Marion County Circuit Court 19CV08735; A171380
486 P3d 38
Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of review. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it determined that respondents’ decision not to remove petitioner from the Marion County District Attorney’s Office’s “Brady list” was not subject to challenge via a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John ROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Donna Lee; Arlo Smith, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 1448 28th Avenue, LLC v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Garland v. Washington County Dist. Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Garland v. Washington County Dist. Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025