Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Furlow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Ouachita Circuit Court; George W. Hays, Judge; 1. The evidence offered by appellant to show what the rate was under the contract entered into was only explanatory of the contract, in nowise conflicted with it nor tended to vary or change its terms.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Ouachita Circuit Court; George W. Hays, Judge; 1. The evidence offered by appellant to show what the rate was under the contract entered into was only explanatory of the contract, in nowise conflicted with it nor tended to vary or change its terms. The evidence was competent, and its exclusion was prejudicial. 62 Ark. 330; 53 Ark. 4; 81 Ark. 374; 83 Ark. 163; 63 Ark. 475. 2. Instruction N;o. 5 given at appellant’s request was a correct declaration of the law; and in the face of that instruction it was error to give the 6th instruction requested by appellee. It was also error to…

1Opinion of the CourtBattue, J.

The complaint of plaintiffs, W. H. Furlow and B. M. Bigers, against the defendant, St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, embraces two claims for damages, one for delay in transportation of plaintiffs as passengers and loss of baggage, and the other for injuries to horses sustained while in course of shipment from Coffeyville, Kansas, to Harrell, Arkansas. There is no controversy in this court about the first.

They allege that, on or about the 15th day of September, 1907, plaintiffs loaded in a stock car of the defendant at Coffey-ville, Kansas, twenty-five or twenty-six horses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Kansas & Arkansas Valley Railroad v. AyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. PearceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Soudan Planting Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Wynne Hoop & Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. McElvain v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Cumbie v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API