St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Lane

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellant cites the cases of Railway v. Lock (Tex. Civ. App.) 209 S. W. 181, and *63Railway v. Cox (Tex. Civ. App.) 221 S. W. 1043, six times in its motion for rehearing, but in spite of that fact neither has any applicability to the facts of this case. In the first-cited case the initial carrier refused to Be bound beyond its own line and insisted on limiting its liability to its own line; the court held there was no through shipment. No such facts appear in this case.

In the other cited case it was held that in order to recover from a terminal carrier for damages caused…