Legal Opinion

Dreier v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1911No. Nos. 358 and 359PublishedCited by 78 opinions

ERROR TO AND APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. The facts, which involve the validity of a subpoena duces tecum issued to the custodian of the books of á corporation, and the right of such custodian to refuse to produce the documents required by such subpoena bn the ground that they would incriminate him, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO AND APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. The facts, which involve the validity of a subpoena duces tecum issued to the custodian of the books of á corporation, and the right of such custodian to refuse to produce the documents required by such subpoena bn the ground that they would incriminate him, are stated in the opinion. Dreier had an absolute right to refuse to produce books for the consideration of the grand jury or to give testimony upon the ground that to do so might tend to incriminate him. Burr’s Trial, 244; Counselman v.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

The plaintiff in error and appellant, William Dreier, was subpoenaed to produce before the grand jury in the Circuit Court certain books and papers of the Lichtenstein Millinery Company, a New York corporation, of which he was the secretary.' The grand jury was conducting an inquiry with respect to alleged violations of the customs laws by N. Hayes and others. The subpoena contained the ad testificandum clause, but the only question presented is with respect to the demand for the corporate documents. For his refusal to produce them for the inspection of the grand jury, Dreier was committed…

2Cited by78 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API